![]() |
||
![]() | ||
| |
|
|
2004 Digital Counties Survey WINNERS ANNOUNCED The Center for Digital Government and National Association of Counties (NACo) are pleased to announce the winners of their 2004 Digital Counties Survey, a national survey sponsored by SAP, a proud supporter of all local governments in the United States. In April, all counties in the United States were invited to participate in the survey, which consisted of 17 questions that focused on how county governments are applying information technology to effectively deliver services to their citizens. The survey grouped counties into four population categories: 500,000 or more; 250,000-499,999; 150,000-249,999; and less than 150,000. At the conclusion of the survey, a top-10 ranking was established for each population category. It gives us great pleasure to honor and acknowledge the hard work and effort put forth by all of our nation’s top digital county governments. Congratulations to all of them. TOP 10 DIGITAL COUNTIES Population 500,000 or more 1st Place: San Diego County, Calif. 2nd Place: Orange County, Fla. 3rd Place: Alameda County, Calif. 4th Place: Bernalillo County, N.M. 4th Place: Tulsa County, Okla. 5th Place: Snohomish County, Wash. 6th Place: Sacramento County, Calif. 7th Place: Hennepin County, Minn. 8th Place: Wake County, N.C. 9th Place: Fulton County, Ga. 10th Place: Montgomery County, Md. Population 250,000-499,999 1st Place: Johnson County, Kan. 1st Place: Prince William County, Va. 2nd Place: Sarasota County, Fla. 3rd Place: Seminole County, Fla. 4th Place: Lee County, Fla. 5th Place: Sedgwick County, Kan. 6th Place: Boulder County, Colo. 7th Place: Loudoun County, Va. 8th Place: Polk County, Iowa 9th Place: Larimer County, Colo. 10th Place: Dutchess County, NY 10th Place: Utah County, Utah Population Category 150,000-249,999 1st Place: Roanoke County, Va. 2nd Place: Yakima County, Wash. 3rd Place: Howard County, Md. 4th Place: Clermont County, Ohio 5th Place: Hamilton County, Ind. 6th Place: Racine County, Wis. 7th Place: El Dorado County, Calif. 8th Place: Merced County, Calif. 9th Place: Frederick County, Md. 10th Place: Jackson County, Ore. Population Category Less than 150,000 1st Place: Charles County, Md. 2nd Place: Nevada County, Calif. 3rd Place: Stearns County, Minn. 4th Place: Napa County, Calif. 5th Place: Oconee County, Ga. 6th Place: Sutter County, Calif. 7th Place: Olmsted County, Minn. 8th Place: Albemarle County, Va. 9th Place: Delaware County, Ohio 10th Place: Butler County, Iowa BRIEF STATISTICS Eighty-eight percent of all respondents in the top three population categories have an IT strategic plan, and 45 percent of those have updated their plans in the previous two years. An average of 19 percent of all counties surveyed provide Web-casting (audio, video or live streaming video) of their county governing body meetings. Sixty percent provide meeting agendas or minutes on their Web sites. In the top two population categories, more than 50 percent of the counties allow online submission of job applications for 26 percent or more of available county positions. For a copy of 2004 Digital Counties Survey report, click here. For more information on the Digital Counties Survey, contact Janet Grenslitt at jgrenslitt@centerdigitalgov.com. 2004 Digital Counties Survey Sponsor:
SAP Public Services SAP is the world's leading provider of business software solutions. SAP Public Services is helping states, cities, counties, and school districts transform their enterprises by providing integrated software solutions to help government organizations respond quickly to changing regulations and citizen needs, streamline and simplify business processes, and share vital information across agencies for enhanced decision making and performance. |
View 2003 Digital Counties Survey Summary
About Us
The Center for Digital Government is a national research and advisory institute on information
technology policies and best practices in state and local government. A private organization
based in Folsom, Calif., the Center’s advisory services, online resources and special reports
provide public- and private-sector leaders with decision support, knowledge and opportunities
to help them effectively incorporate new technologies in the 21st century.
|